Unfortunately, if you're looking to game in HDR, it can't deliver a satisfying experience. In any case, if those numbers are more or less accurate then a quick calculation tells us someone with ideal eye sight detects 8,400 “details”, or as we’ll just call them, pixels. Taking all of that into account, a 27” gaming monitor running at 1440p or QHD would be best viewed from about 80cm to one meter (three feet). Overall, it's an impressive model that most people should be satisfied with. It has an optional Black Frame Insertion feature that can help improve motion clarity; however, like most monitors, it isn't usable while variable refresh rate is active. How many degrees the 3840 pixels fill depends on the size of the monitor and your distance from the screen. Is 27″ inch too small for 4K? Several formulas have been developed over time for determining the ideal viewing distance from seat to screen. Your preferred viewing distance depends on your field of vision, or FOV, and size of your gaming monitor. At 4K you really should be looking at a 32 inch monitor, but yeah if 27 is the max size, then 4K is going to look extremely sharp at that res. This size of monitor strikes a good balance between screen real estate and desk space, and whether you're displaying older 1080p content or playing the latest 4k games, it'll look good. The best 27 inch monitor in the budget category we've tested is the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV. With 4K imagery on a larger screen (e.g., 80 to 105 inches diagonal), the ideal viewing distance increases to 12-15 feet. In contrast, the ideal viewing distance for a typical 50 inch 1080p HD display is approximately 12-15 feet, and 15-20 feet for a 105 inch 1080p display. Extreme screen density makes everything look tiny and cramped, like too much has been forced on screen. It gets bright enough to overcome glare, but sadly, not enough to deliver a satisfying HDR experience. You’ll need to move your head constantly to track details, causing fatigue, plus you’ll notice individual pixels. Staff budget choice. There are different opinions on the web about this. You can see what products we currently have for sale. Beyond 6 feet you must have at least a 70-inch panel to observe noticeable differences between Full HD and 4K, although a 90/100-inch display it’s preferable. 160 St-Viateur Est, Suite 408, Montreal, Canada, H2T 1A8, The 7 Best 27 Inch Monitors - Winter 2020. The resolution of the TV will also play a role in how far you can sit from the TV. If you constantly swivel your head side to side to focus on details you’re sitting too close. It depends on your viewing distance. Last but not least, it has three USB-A 3.0 ports and two USB-C ports that support DisplayPort Alt Mode, allowing you to display an image from a compatible device while charging it at the same time. However, the average acuity for a healthy adult under the age of 60 or 70 is actually closer to between 20/13 and 20/17 (source 1 and 2 ). However, you’ll have to figure out your ideal viewing distance by yourself. User rating, 5 out of 5 stars with … So stop complaining If the size is smaller than what is needed, having the best response times and refresh rates will not be optimally beneficial. The bigger the screen, the more is the number of windows fitting inside, and consequently, more multitasking becomes possible. If you choose a 32” QHD monitor, the ideal distance goes up a little from 80cm to 96cm, and the maximum to 1.3 meters (4.5 feet). I never had a 24.5-inch (240hz) monitor and I have been using a 27-inch 4k monitor at 27" (70) cm viewing distance. 01/09/2020: Added the ASUS TUF VG27AQ and the Acer Predator XB271HU. All in all, this is the best 27 inch monitor for HDR we've tested. So many resolutions and options to choose from, and more games than they could possibly have enough time to enjoy on multiple platforms. Featuring BenQ proprietary HDRi technology, 144Hz, and FreeSync, EX2780Q is your best gaming monitor. Sit too close and your FOV won’t cover the whole screen. Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best 27 inch monitors currently available. Its input lag is remarkably low and remains low even when playing in 10-bit HDR. 27 inch monitors vary significantly in performance and features and are one of the most popular sizes on the market today. Overall, this is an excellent gaming monitor that should please casual and hardcore gamers alike. The pixel density is also lower for a 27-inch screen, at 109ppi rather than 163ppi, but image quality still looks absolutely super-sharp. Eye experts believe healthy, average humans have an FOV of 140 degrees. The correct distance is at least at the point … Gain early access to all tests results for new products, Prices will now be listed directly in reviews and tables, Have 5 votes per product category to choose which product we’ll review next, Gain unlimited access to detailed test results in tools and results (no blurred results), Having trouble deciding between two monitors? Gamers have become spoiled for choice. The pixel density is still lower but I no longer see pixelated images or jagged text at a close distance. That arc covers 140 degrees, and research indicates a person with perfect vision can notice details as small as 1/60th of a degree. It’s a fine choice if the U2720Q is out of stock, or if you can get it for significantly less than … 4.6 out of 5 stars 169. (measured from screen surface to eyes) Again this is just a general rule of thumb. Yet some nagging questions remain. It has one of the best HDR color gamuts we've tested. Less than that and graphics look overblown, smudgy, or lacking in detail. There aren't any gaming-specific features, but you do get a QuickFit Virtual Scale feature, which allows you to preview documents in their actual sizes before printing. Be part of the most informed community and take advantage of our advanced tools to find the best product for your needs. For a 4K monitor, you don’t want it filling more than 24 horizontal field of view degrees. It has near full coverage of the sRGB color space, with excellent gradient handling to minimize banding. Forget the talk about response times and refresh rates, as they significantly matter only when you have the monitor of the right size. But for Monitor use i would still stick with the 1x diagonal size. The average FOV width for the human eye is 140 degrees. 4K 144hz is what I would be looking for. Details will blur and image quality won’t matter. It’s largely agreed human sight is best adjusted for a pixel density of 100-120 pixels per inch (PPI). However, on a 55“, you can now sit as close as 3.6 feet and enjoy a visibly smoother and more detailed picture (e.g you won’t see the individual pixels). Higher-resolution screens have driven the demand for larger monitors, and 27" has emerged as one of the most popular sizes. There are four USB 3.0 ports that you can use for charging or data transfer and a 3.5 mm analog audio port that lets you play audio from an external device using its integrated speakers. It gets bright enough to provide great visibility in well-lit environments, but unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio that makes blacks look grayish, which isn't ideal for dark rooms. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors. If you want to use it for HDR gaming, it has a 144Hz refresh rate and native G-SYNC support. 4K displays come in a range of sizes, but most commonly 24-, 27-, and 32-inch. 07/28/2020: Replaced the Acer Predator XB271HU with the ASUS VG279QM; moved the Acer Predator X27 from an alternative to a main pick. Overall, if you can afford it, the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV is a much better choice, as the increase in resolution at a 27 inch screen size is very noticeable. They are adapted to be valid for most people, in each price range. See a full list of TV sizes and viewing distance ranges for a 4K TV.. TV Resolution and 4K Impacts on Seating Distance. We use cookies and similar technologies to process personal information for the operation of our website, statistical analysis, and providing targeted advertising. Ideal is greater than 160 pixels per degree of field of view. In a previous article we established that a great sweet spot for gaming monitors uses a 2560 x 1440 resolution (or QHD) with a 27” panel. Overall, the LG is a better choice for most people, as it's more versatile and cheaper. Sit too close and your FOV won’t cover the whole screen. If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our monitor reviews. It has native FreeSync support and is certified as G-SYNC compatible. Most people don’t consider the pixels-per-inch (PPI) when looking at a monitor. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? Overall, the Samsung is a better choice due to its higher resolution. It has excellent coverage of the commonly-used DCI-P3 color space and good coverage of the wider Rec. A starting point where you can then adjust from bassed on personal preference. That’s why, previous article we established that a great sweet spot for gaming monitors uses a 2560 x 1440 resolution (or QHD) with a 27” panel. That 1/60 should also provide a hint to why monitors use refresh rates based on multipliers of 30Hz and 60Hz. I don't think 4K is too much on a 27 inch monitor. With a 27 inch screen, its 4k resolution is breathtaking. Rounding this part out, 27” for 1440p gaming monitors works so well because of ideal pixel density. We can’t determine people’s vision in pixels or resolutions as neatly as we do with technology – not yet at least! But even so, is there any visible improvement in 4k vs 2k for a 27" at normal viewing distance, or the additional resolution is just a waste ? That means viewing distance tends to come across as very subjective, almost like a taste test. It has a lower 1080p resolution, which isn't the best for work, but it should be good enough for gaming and media consumption. If you're shopping on a very tight budget and find the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV too expensive, then check out the MSI Optix MAG273R. Between eye doctors and technology associations and companies, you’ll get a lot of different opinions on viewing distance. The best 27 inch monitor for gaming we've tested is the Samsung Odyssey G7. Both form factors maintain optimal pixel density. The response time is excellent, resulting in smooth motion, and even though it doesn't have a black frame insertion feature to clear up motion blur, you shouldn't need one. We’ll answer that for you, you can’t. Which for an 82" would be roughly 10 feet. So, at a regular viewing distance (~ 4ft or 120cm), you won’t be able to distinguish individual pixels. The above figures for a 27” 1440p gaming monitor are confirmed by our own experience and research by monitor manufacturers such as BenQ. Removed ASUS TUF VG27AQ and HP 27f. Although we tested the 32 inch variant, the 27 inch is identical and should perform the same. However, for QHD we strongly recommend 27” as the highest fidelity form factor. The Acer Predator X27 is the best 27 inch monitor for viewing HDR content we've tested. It's a versatile 1440p model with an IPS panel, providing great viewing angles that allow you to share work or content easily. You have people that think good 1080p content looks like 4K and others who can’t tell the difference between 8K and 720p. But to make the most of such a screen, where should you place yourself relative to the display? It doesn't get as bright and has worse reflection handling, so visibility isn't as good in well-lit rooms. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up There is a point at which your eyes can make out the individual pixels of the TV screen, and the picture begins to degrade based on your visual acuity. Despite having a curved screen, it has reasonably good ergonomics, allowing you to adjust the screen to your optimal viewing position. And things will only get busier (and happier) in the future for gamers. $376.99 $ 376. However, if you need better ergonomics, then go with the Dell. It has a 144Hz refresh rate and quick response time, and it supports FreeSync to reduce screen tearing. There's enough screen space for multitasking, and it even supports HDR, even though its performance is severely limited by the lack of wide color gamut support and mediocre peak brightness in HDR mode. So many resolutions and options to choose from, and more games than they could possibly have enough time to enjoy on multiple platforms. By the way, panel type has little to nothing to do with viewing distance. On the upside, it has near-perfect coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing, and it's a good choice to use in bright rooms since it has decent reflection handling and comes with blinders. These figures use recommendations from the SMPTE, or the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. If you want to buy a 40/50-inch TV, the best deal is to sit at a distance between 3.5 and 5 feet. Not distance, so make sure you don’t confuse the two. Imagine an arc extending directly in front of your eyes as you sit still. It’s largely agreed human sight is best adjusted for a pixel density of 100-120 pixels per inch (PPI). While we have tests to measure eye sight quality, none offer precise standards. A 4K monitor probably won't offer a big enough … Notes: The audience should sit at least this distance from the screen.This is the Shortest Recommended Viewing Distance based on Field-of-View being too wide: This distance is calculated on the peripheral vision field of view of the human eye. Shop for 27 inch 4k computer monitors at Best Buy. Budget 4K monitor: Philips 276E8VJSB. Do you guys think the distance is too far for FPS games and rather use it closer but possibly seeing worse image quality? You get roughly 92 pixels per inch, which is equivalent to the pixel density of a 24″ 1080p monitor. Between 5 and 6 feet is the ideal viewing distance for a 55” or 65” 4K monitor. Their standards call for a similar ideal viewing distance of 80cm from a 27” 1440p screen to maintain enjoyable gaming experiences without incurring fatigue. Other options New and used from $359.44. It has a faster response time, and its 240Hz native refresh rate can be overclocked up to 280Hz for a smoother gaming experience. TV and Monitors HD 4k: Viewing Distance. There's FreeSync support, though, and it's also compatible with recent NVIDIA graphics cards so that you can enjoy smooth gaming with minimal screen tear. You could sit really close to the screen, but then your field of vision may get drowned out or you’ll see individual pixels, which makes for a very unpleasant experience. On the upside, it has a higher HDR peak brightness and can display a wide color gamut, making it a better choice for viewing HDR content. It has a VA panel that can produce deep blacks for gaming in the dark, and it overcomes glare easily in brightly-lit settings. You could get a 27-inch Acer Predator at 1440p resolution or a 24-inch Acer Predatorat 1080p resolution and get very similar PPI. Extreme screen density makes everything look tiny and cramped, like too much has been forced on screen. Ranging from the most basic 1080p monitors to 4k gaming powerhouses, the best 27 inch gaming monitors are available to match any budget and need, whether you're a weekend warrior or professional esports player. Pictures are rendered in m… 03/09/2020: Removed the LG 27GL83A-B from Notable Mentions. Humans simply can’t notice details beyond a certain distance, usually 7m or farther out. That said, the jump from 1440p isn't that huge at that size. 2K QHD 144Hz IPS panel EX2780Q with HDRi and superior audiovisual features delivers the best immersive gaming experience. Yet some nagging questions remain. It has a good color gamut, but it simply doesn't get bright enough to make highlights stand out the way they should in HDR content. That said, its gray uniformity is excellent, with almost no dirty screen effect, and the 10-bit panel has exceptional gradient performance. However, if cost is a concern, the MSI Optix MAG273R is also a very good choice. Remember though, there’s an absolute “too far”, even for a 100” screen showing 8K. It shouldn't be an issue for most gamers, but the resulting pixel density is a bit low if you're planning on using it for work. It has an impressive build quality despite its low price, but its ergonomics are sub-par, as it lacks swivel adjustment and can't rotate to portrait mode. It gets extremely bright in HDR, bringing out highlights the way they're supposed to. One of them has to do with viewing distance. put them under the same test bench, The best 27 inch 4k monitor that we've tested is the LG 27UK650-W. Model: U2720QM. Casual gamers will surely appreciate its low input lag and great response time, but the 60Hz refresh rate might be limiting for more serious gamers. The big difference between them is pixel density, which is measured in dots per inch (DPI). The Z27 is usually a little cheaper than the Dell U2720Q, but it’s not quite as good. 09/28/2020: Replaced Dell U2718Q with Dell UltraSharp U2720Q, replaced ASUS VG279Q with ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV. If you want a monitor with an even higher refresh rate, then check out the ASUS VG279QM. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the metrics that fare worse are often not noticeable unless you really look for them. A 4K resolution at 24 inches is very different from a 4K at 32 inches or greater. 99 $399.99 $399.99. This is a good choice for any type of use thanks to its great out-of-box color accuracy and the clear images it delivers. Get it as soon as Tue, Nov 24. You may opt out of performance cookies, Sorry, there were no results from your search, Gamers have become spoiled for choice. Dell - LED Monitor - Black. Taking all of that into account, a 27” gaming monitor running at 1440p or QHD would be best viewed from about 80cm to one meter (three feet). Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. We've tested over 135 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best 27 inch monitors to buy. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. It has the same size and resolution as the LG 27UK650-W, but it provides significantly better ergonomic adjustments, including a wide swivel range. One of them has to do with viewing distance. It also has a low contrast ratio, so blacks appear closer to gray in the dark. Unlike the Samsung Odyssey G7, this model has an IPS panel that provides wider viewing angles, but at the cost of a lower contrast ratio, resulting in blacks that look grayish in the dark. Also, its edge-lit local dimming performs poorly as there are few dimming zones. Retina is Apple's trademark for a display so sharp that the human eye is unable to distinguish between pixels at a typical viewing distance. The 4K… 02 $339.00 $339.00 But yeah at 27" 4K is a night and day difference, native 4k even makes 1440p look soft. That arc covers 140 degrees, and research indicates a person with perfect vision can notice details as small as 1/60, Rounding this part out, 27” for 1440p gaming monitors works so well because of ideal pixel density. FREE Shipping by Amazon. According to Randomoneh's chart for a 50 inch 4k tv you need to be between 20 and 11 which IMHO is MUCH MUCH more accurate for me than that other chart. I mean a much smaller 27 inch 1440p monitor I have no problem at ~6 feet and considering the pixels are significantly bigger on a 50 inch 4k tv I would be able to view it from 10-15 feet easily. It has a good build quality, and its superb ergonomics let you place the screen exactly the way you like for the best viewing experience. From far enough even 16K looks the same as 480p. Resolution: 3840 … The rule is that if the viewer sits any closer than this distance to the … LG 27UL550-W 27 Inch 4K UHD IPS LED HDR Monitor with Radeon Freesync Technology and HDR 10, Silver. The two big factors I see discussed are size and resolution (with G-Sync/Freesync, response time, and everything else considered somewhere down the line). Imagine an arc extending directly in front of your eyes as you sit still. The formula to c… I think 27-inch is the perfect size for a 4K monitor; It has the pixel density of 163 ppi, as compared to 220 ppi on the Macbook Pro 15’s display. 2020 color space. Go to a movie theater and check that for yourself. Dell S2721QS 27 Inch 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) IPS Ultra-Thin Bezel Monitor, AMD FreeSync (HDMI, DisplayPort), VESA Certified, Silver 4.6 out of 5 stars 129 $305.02 $ 305 . It has an IPS panel, so the viewing angles are great for sharing work with people next to you, but that comes at the cost of a good contrast ratio and black uniformity, which are both mediocre. Philips makes it easy to spend far … Can you tell if the movie’s playing in 4K, QHD, or 1080p? Added Samsung Odyssey G7 and MSI Optix MAG273R. Be the first to start a discussion about Best 27 Inch Monitors, Store-bought monitors; no cherry-picked units. Although this is an expensive model, it supports HDR10, and it's a great overall 4k monitor with outstanding picture quality in HDR, even as good as some TVs. You’ll need to move your head constantly to track details, causing fatigue, plus you’ll notice individual pixels. If you need to lean in and squint to make out details on a regular basis then you’re sitting too far. This is a good choice for any type of use thanks to its great out-of-box color accuracy and the clear images it delivers. All display sizes provide the same number of pixels on the screen. Even on a 48″ sized screen, 4K UHD resolution looks sharp! Its response time is fast, input lag is low, and its 75Hz refresh rate makes motion look more fluid than a simple 60Hz panel. We purchase our own monitors and So exercise common sense and listen to your eyes and body movements to get the gaming joy you want. Sadly, it has disappointing out-of-the-box color accuracy, so you should get it calibrated to enjoy it to the fullest. Importantly, if your eye sight isn’t 20/20 then you need to adjust viewing distance to compensate – typically by sitting closer or getting a bigger display. After that’s decided, I usually see people opt for the largest and most expensive monitor they can afford. so that you can compare the results easily. Aside from all of that numerology, ultimately you’ll figure out the best viewing distance for you through trial by gaming. But assuming “perfect” eye sight in a theoretical person (20/20 vision, also known as 6/6 and other terms), we can assert reasonably applicable markers you can use for the best results possible.